NEW MOTION PASSED IN EU PARLIAMENT

  The European Parliament recently passed a motion.   The motion was passed in response to ‘neo fascist violence’. The motion contains a very long pre-amble with a large number of assertions, the majority of wish are not supported by a citation.  For example at paragraph E; “whereas neo-fascist groups have taken the lives of thousands of people of all kinds,…

Read More

DWP TERMINATES DOCTOR’S CONTRACT OVER USE OF GENDER PRONOUNS

A doctor is having his contract with the DWP terminated due to his refusal to use neutral gender pronouns, see here.  It is cases like this one that have led me to advocate for reform of employment law, see here and laws to ensure that ideas are not stifled through commercial pressure, see here. Apparently it was argued that his…

Read More

SUPREME COURT REJECTS TINI OWENS APPEAL

Further to the judgment of the Supreme Court rejecting to appeal of Tini Owens and my articles on the subject (see here, here & here), I have not been surprised by any of the commentary on the judgment.  The observation that something is not ‘modern’ is posited as a sufficient reason for reform or abolishment. Even the argument that refusing…

Read More

REFLECTIONS ON THE ALISON CHABLOZ CONVICTION; IS HOLOCAUST DENIAL NOW A CRIMINAL OFFENCE?

Alison Chabloz was convicted recently of an offence under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, for uploading to Youtube, three songs that she performed.  The songs included lyrics stating that, the gas chambers in WWII were a fabrication, the diary of Ann Frank was inauthentic, Elie Wiesel’s account was falsified for personal gain and that Jews control the mass media…

Read More

GENERATION IDENTITY: THE EQUALITY ACT & EMPLOYMENT LAW

There have been news stories recently about the co-leader of the British branch of Generation Identity (“GI”), Mr Tom Dupre', and his employer, Standard Charted PLC.  The headlines state that Mr Dupre' has been ‘fired’ but from reading the actual content of the stories, it appears that Standard Charted have simply confirmed that he is no longer an employee.  Allegedly,…

Read More

Tini Owens case being heard in Supreme Court

The Tini Owens appeal is currently being heard by the Supreme Court.  The Appellant's solicitor, Mr Beecle, has stated that the appeal is not an attempt to change the law but instead concerns the correct interpretation of section 1(2)(b) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.  This states: "the Respondent has behaved in such a way that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected…

Read More

DISHONEST CLAIMANT LEFT WITH DEBT TO HOSPITAL IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE

A dishonest Claimant, who exaggerated the extent of his injuries, was left with a debt to the Defendant hospital, at the conclusion of proceedings, see here Liability was admitted.  The Claimant had intimated a claim for over £800,000.  Investigations carried out on behalf of the Defendant showed that he had exaggerated and lied about his injuries.   This included the false claim that he…

Read More

ASSESSING DAMAGES FOR BREACHES OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – NEW SUPREME COURT RULING

The Supreme Court has recently issued guidance for assessing damages in claims for breach of restrictive covenants.  See here for the press summary and here for the full judgment. The Supreme Court held that the trial judge and the Court of Appeal had adopted the wrong approach.  The gist of the claimant’s case was that it suffered financial loss in the form of lost profits and goodwill.  Whilst…

Read More

ENOCH POWELL; CENSORSHIP & MODERN HATE SPEECH LAWS

50 years after the event, Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech is causing controversy, thanks to complaints by Labour Peer, Andrew Adonis about the BBC’s plan to play the speech as part of a documentary which will analyse it and discuss the subject matter. Adonis does not believe the BBC should broadcast the actual speech.  He has been told that…

Read More

LEGISLATING AGAINST SOFT ATTACKS ON FREE SPEECH – PART III – BOYCOTTS

This is the final part of a 3 part article, titled ‘Soft Attacks on Free Speech’ (see here for part II, which has a link to part I).  In this part I briefly look at boycotts and conclude that whilst they can sometimes be regarded as contemptible, with false justifications being provided for them, there should not be a law against…

Read More