Home

INTERNET CENSORSHIP

HERE is a campaign organized by the Anti-Defamation League for advertisers to boycott Facebook for a month.  The organisation lists 10 demands that should be addressed immediately, although apparently these will not be sufficient to address the problem. The demands include removing groups that promote ‘climate denialism’ and ‘vaccine misinformation’.  It also includes requiring Facebook to evaluate policies for ‘bias’…

Read More

TUCKER CARLSON – ANARCHO-TYRANNY

TUCKER CARLSON provided an interesting analysis of the horrific events currently taking place in the United States, last Saturday.  He did not use the expression anarcho-tyranny, but this seems to be what he was referring to, when he contrasted the ruthless response of state bureaucrats to infringement of petty rules, against the impotent response of the state to the savage…

Read More

CHALLEN JUDGMENT

In a HIGH COURT JUDGMENT    last week, the Court exercised its discretion under the Forfeiture Act 1892, to allow the Claimant, Sally Challen to inherit her deceased husband’s estate, despite being convicted of his manslaughter.  The COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT contains many of the facts relevant to the criminal proceedings. The Court of Appeal ruled that Ms Challen’s murder conviction…

Read More

IS THE COVID 19 LEGISLATION A STEP TOO FAR IN THE RESTRICTION OF FREEDOMS? – BY ABIGAIL LENART

THE COVID 19 LEGISLATION & CIVIL LIBERTIES When there is a state of emergency, there is a danger that executive power oversteps their role in legislating what is necessary and proportionate in the situation. In conjunction with the general widespread hysteria portrayed by the media, the public are less likely to notice provisions in emergency legislation that are ‘shoe-horned’ in…

Read More

JUDICIAL REVIEW AGAINST LOCKDOWN

The English Democrats have sent a letter of claim in accordance with the pre action protocol for judicial review claims, https://www.englishdemocrats.party/lockdown. Below is a link to an article, that alleges that the Covid 19 legislation represents a disproportionate interference with rights and freedoms. The article is primarily focused on human rights legislation, but the same arguments could be used to…

Read More

COVID 19 – THE NEED FOR DISSENT

Whether you agree or disagree with the unprecedented Covid 19 legislation, the need for dissent is vital.  Even if the Government is ‘right’ on this occasion, they may be ‘wrong’ on other occasions, and thus dissent should not be discouraged.  The dissenting opinions are not dangerous if they can be refuted with reason and evidence, whereas the suppression of dissent…

Read More